[Letux-kernel] ti,non-removable vs. non-removable

Tony Lindgren tony at atomide.com
Mon Jun 18 08:59:15 CEST 2018

* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com> [180617 16:05]:
> Hi Tony,
> we still use ti,non-removable; for mmc ports but I wonder if is it safe
> to replace it with non-removable; ?
> The bindings docs tell not much:
> Only one of the properties in this section should be supplied:
>   - broken-cd: There is no card detection available; polling must be used.
>   - cd-gpios: Specify GPIOs for card detection, see gpio binding
>   - non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC); assume always present.
> vs.
> - ti,non-removable:	non-removable slot (like eMMC)
> So are they interchangeable or do they have subtle difference?

>From what I recall we should just use non-removable now and they
do the same thing.



More information about the Letux-kernel mailing list