[Letux-kernel] ti,non-removable vs. non-removable

H. Nikolaus Schaller hns at goldelico.com
Mon Jun 18 11:26:36 CEST 2018

> Am 18.06.2018 um 08:59 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>:
> * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com> [180617 16:05]:
>> Hi Tony,
>> we still use ti,non-removable; for mmc ports but I wonder if is it safe
>> to replace it with non-removable; ?
>> The bindings docs tell not much:
>> Only one of the properties in this section should be supplied:
>>  - broken-cd: There is no card detection available; polling must be used.
>>  - cd-gpios: Specify GPIOs for card detection, see gpio binding
>>  - non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC); assume always present.
>> vs.
>> - ti,non-removable:	non-removable slot (like eMMC)
>> So are they interchangeable or do they have subtle difference?
> From what I recall we should just use non-removable now and they
> do the same thing.

Ok, fine. I'll update our gta04.dts files accordingly. There is a
a batch of tiny improvements and new stuff in preparation.

BR and thanks,

More information about the Letux-kernel mailing list