[Letux-kernel] ti,non-removable vs. non-removable

H. Nikolaus Schaller hns at goldelico.com
Sun Jun 17 18:02:35 CEST 2018

Hi Tony,
we still use ti,non-removable; for mmc ports but I wonder if is it safe
to replace it with non-removable; ?

The bindings docs tell not much:

Only one of the properties in this section should be supplied:
  - broken-cd: There is no card detection available; polling must be used.
  - cd-gpios: Specify GPIOs for card detection, see gpio binding
  - non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC); assume always present.


- ti,non-removable:	non-removable slot (like eMMC)

So are they interchangeable or do they have subtle difference?

BR and thanks,

More information about the Letux-kernel mailing list