[Openpvrsgx-devgroup] openpvrsgx-devgroup Digest, Vol 11, Issue 8

Alif Ilhan alifilhan0 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 12:03:13 CEST 2020 

Okay thank you. I will check out the code in my PC today and build it. Then
I will inform the bugs.
Thanks for the info
Alif

On Fri, 16 Oct 2020, 4:00 p.m. , <openpvrsgx-devgroup-request at letux.org>
wrote:

> Send openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list submissions to
>         openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openpvrsgx-devgroup
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         openpvrsgx-devgroup-request at letux.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         openpvrsgx-devgroup-owner at letux.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of openpvrsgx-devgroup digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: openpvrsgx-devgroup Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
>       (H. Nikolaus Schaller)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:01:06 +0200
> From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns at goldelico.com>
> To: OpenPVRSGX Linux Driver Group <openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openpvrsgx-devgroup] openpvrsgx-devgroup Digest, Vol 11,
>         Issue 6
> Message-ID: <3027F737-11CE-464D-A61E-A3C05BB5D62F at goldelico.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi Alif,
>
> > Am 14.10.2020 um 17:54 schrieb Alif Ilhan <alifilhan0 at gmail.com>:
> >
> > One more question. Which branch to use? I see there are branches like
> letux-pvrsrvkm-59-rc2 etc. I am currently trying with letux-pvrsrvkm
> (default). Did I choose the correct branch? I see more fresh activities in
> letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc2
>
> yes, the letux-pvrsrvkm branch is a little outdated (seems to be v5.6).
>
> letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc2 is the latest one.
>
> Unfortunately this is a little confusing. The reason is that there are
> several
> feature branches which are merged into a single "complete" kernel. These
> feature-branches are rebased every now and then, so that we can remove
> patches
> which have arrived upstream or can follow API changes.
>
> For the Letux project this is done almost automatically every week so there
> would be a letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9.0.
>
> But this way of rapid rebase+merge gave a non-linear history between e.g.
> letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc1 and letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc2. This makes detection of
> changes and bisects too difficult.
>
> So the current work-around is to rebase only once every major release. This
> will be letux-pvrsrvkm-5.10-rc1 or letux-pvrsrvkm-5.10-rc2 in ca. 2-3
> weeks.
>
> Until then please try letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc2 which should also be the
> (current)
> basis if you want to submit patches and fixes to this list.
>
> If you need some bug fixes from upstream kernel (it is still a -rc) and try
> with latest linus/master, please do:
>
>         git checkout letux-pvrsrvkm-5.9-rc2
>         git merge v5.9
>
> If you fix something, please commit on top of this and do a git-format for
> your patches. I can then integrate them into the tree for everyones
> benefit.
>
> BR and thanks,
> Nikolaus
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, 4:00 p.m. , <openpvrsgx-devgroup-request at letux.org>
> wrote:
> > Send openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list submissions to
> >         openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >
> http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openpvrsgx-devgroup
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         openpvrsgx-devgroup-request at letux.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         openpvrsgx-devgroup-owner at letux.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of openpvrsgx-devgroup digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. About PowerVR DDKs (Alif Ilhan)
> >    2. Re: About PowerVR DDKs (H. Nikolaus Schaller)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 22:17:58 +0600
> > From: Alif Ilhan <alifilhan0 at gmail.com>
> > To: openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
> > Subject: [Openpvrsgx-devgroup] About PowerVR DDKs
> > Message-ID:
> >         <
> CAPfpOrZuci7T6S4VU4x8aE0uOJgfWXTisizsKp3fVF2UkmvQGA at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > I want to build this kernel with the PVR module for Intel Atom N2600. But
> > which DDK should I select? There are a lot of options like Ti, SUN4i,
> > Ingenic Generic. But which is appropiate for the SGX545?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alif
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/openpvrsgx-devgroup/attachments/20201013/23a1c079/attachment.html
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:38:40 +0200
> > From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns at goldelico.com>
> > To: OpenPVRSGX Linux Driver Group <openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Openpvrsgx-devgroup] About PowerVR DDKs
> > Message-ID: <E7A06234-D3B7-44A6-9839-4DBF27511AB5 at goldelico.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Hi Alif,
> >
> > > Am 13.10.2020 um 18:17 schrieb Alif Ilhan <alifilhan0 at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > I want to build this kernel with the PVR module for Intel Atom N2600.
> But which DDK should I select? There are a lot of options like Ti, SUN4i,
> Ingenic Generic. But which is appropiate for the SGX545?
> >
> > That is a good question :)
> >
> > Well, there is no specific option for SGX545 but for different SoC.
> > The idea is to make a generic driver handle all SGX5 variants without
> configuration (only through device tree which describes the hardware).
> >
> > Here is my .config for some OMAP processor:
> >
> > iMac:master hns$ fgrep SGX .config
> > CONFIG_SGX=y
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_9_2188537 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_9_2253347 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_10_2359475 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_13_3341330 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_14_3699939 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_14_3759903 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_14_3841212 is not set
> > # CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_15_4564147 is not set
> > CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_17_4948957=y
> > # CONFIG_SGX_DEBUG is not set
> > CONFIG_SGX_DRM=y
> > CONFIG_SGX_OMAP=m
> > # CONFIG_SGX_GENERIC is not set
> > iMac:master hns$
> >
> > I think your setup should have a CONFIG_SGX_CEDARVIEW for Intel.
> > It should become visible if your setup has CONFIG_MATOM=y and
> CONFIG_SGX=y.
> > I hope it has. If not, we have a bug with Makefile and Kconfig.
> >
> > Please check with drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx/Makefile and Kconfig
> >
> > Next is to choose some DDK version.
> >
> > iMac:master hns$ find drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx/ -name '*cedarview*'
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.13.3341330/eurasia_km/eurasiacon/build/linux2/pc_i686_cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.13.3341330/eurasia_km/services4/system/cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.14.3699939/eurasia_km/eurasiacon/build/linux2/pc_i686_cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.14.3699939/eurasia_km/services4/system/cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.14.3759903/eurasia_km/eurasiacon/build/linux2/pc_i686_cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.14.3759903/eurasia_km/services4/system/cedarview_linux
> >
> drivers/gpu/drm/pvrsgx//1.14.3841212/eurasia_km/services4/system/cedarview_linux
> > iMac:master hns$
> >
> > shows which DDKs should compile. Best is to start with
> CONFIG_PVRSGX_1_14_3699939.
> >
> > This will be the first hurdle to jump over...
> > Then we will see what problem surfaces next.
> >
> > BR and thanks,
> > Nikolaus
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx
> > openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list
> > openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
> > http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openpvrsgx-devgroup
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of openpvrsgx-devgroup Digest, Vol 11, Issue 6
> > **************************************************
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx
> > openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list
> > openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
> > https://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openpvrsgx-devgroup
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx
> openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list
> openpvrsgx-devgroup at letux.org
> http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/openpvrsgx-devgroup
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of openpvrsgx-devgroup Digest, Vol 11, Issue 8
> **************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/openpvrsgx-devgroup/attachments/20201016/4ac9b73a/attachment.htm>

More information about the openpvrsgx-devgroup mailing list