[Letux-kernel] [PATCH v3 6/8] ARM: dts: omap36xx: using OPP1G needs to control the abb_ldo
H. Nikolaus Schaller
hns at goldelico.com
Sat Sep 14 11:30:10 CEST 2019
> Am 13.09.2019 um 23:13 schrieb Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:47 PM H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com> wrote:
>>
>> See DM3730,DM275 data sheet (SPRS685B) footnote (6) in Table 4-19
>> which says that ABB must be switched to FBB mode when using the
>> OPP1G.
>>
>> The LOD definition abb_mpu_iva already exists so that we need
>> to add plumbing for vbb-supply = <&abb_mpu_iva>
>> and define two voltage vectors for each OPP so that the abb LDO
>> is also updated by the ti-cpufreq driver.
>>
>> We also must switch the ti_cpufreq_soc_data to multi_regulator.
>>
>> Note: reading out the abb reglator voltage to verify that
>> it does do transitions can be done by
>>
>> cat /sys/devices/platform/68000000.ocp/483072f0.regulator-abb-mpu/regulator/regulator.*/microvolts
>>
>> Likewise, read the twl4030 provided VDD voltage by
>>
>> cat /sys/devices/platform/68000000.ocp/48070000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0048/48070000.i2c:twl at 48:regulator-vdd1/regulator/regulator.*/microvolts
>>
>> Note: to check if the ABB FBB is enabled/disabled, check
>> registers
>>
>> PRM_LDO_ABB_CTRL 0x483072F4 bit 3:0 1=bypass 5=FBB
>> PRM_LDO_ABB_SETUP 0x483072F0 0x00=bypass 0x11=FBB
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> /dev/mem opened.
>> Memory mapped at address 0xb6fe4000.
>> Value at address 0x483072F4 (0xb6fe42f4): 0x3205
>> /dev/mem opened.
>> Memory mapped at address 0xb6f89000.
>> Value at address 0x483072F4 (0xb6f892f4): 0x3201
>>
>> Note: omap34xx and am3517 have/need no comparable LDO
>> or mechanism.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
>> index cb5bd0969124..4bb4f534afe2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx.dtsi
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> cpu: cpu at 0 {
>> operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
>>
>> + vbb-supply = <&abb_mpu_iva>;
>> clock-latency = <300000>; /* From omap-cpufreq driver */
>> };
>> };
>> @@ -37,9 +38,11 @@
>> /*
>> * we currently only select the max voltage from table
>> * Table 4-19 of the DM3730 Data sheet (SPRS685B)
>> - * Format is: <target min max>
>> + * Format is: cpu0-supply: <target min max>
>> + * vbb-supply: <target min max>
>> */
>> - opp-microvolt = <1012500 1012500 1012500>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1012500 1012500 1012500>,
>> + <1012500 1012500 1012500>;
>> /*
>> * first value is silicon revision bit mask
>> * second one is "speed binned" bit mask
>> @@ -50,25 +53,33 @@
>>
>> opp100-600000000 {
>> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>;
>> - opp-microvolt = <1200000 1200000 1200000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1200000 1200000 1200000>,
>> + <1200000 1200000 1200000>;
>> opp-supported-hw = <0xffffffff 3>;
>> };
>>
>> opp130-800000000 {
>> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
>> - opp-microvolt = <1325000 1325000 1325000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1325000 1325000 1325000>,
>> + <1325000 1325000 1325000>;
>> opp-supported-hw = <0xffffffff 3>;
>> };
>>
>> opp1g-1000000000 {
>> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
>> - opp-microvolt = <1375000 1375000 1375000>;
>> + opp-microvolt = <1375000 1375000 1375000>,
>> + <1375000 1375000 1375000>;
>> /* only on am/dm37x with speed-binned bit set */
>> opp-supported-hw = <0xffffffff 2>;
>> turbo-mode;
>
> If / when the thermal changes I submitted get approved, would you
> entertain dropping this turbo-mode flag so it's enabled by default?
Yes, that makes sense.
To keep patches clearly grouped into two series (better for bisect or
partial revert or apply in any order), I would suggest that we do
1. add OPP1G logic (with turbo-mode; specified)
2. add thermal throttling
3. remove turbo-mode again as soon as both are merged
A patch for 2b is waiting for 1 and 2a to be confirmed :)
BR,
Nikolaus
More information about the Letux-kernel
mailing list