[Lenny400] LetuxOS on SD card for MIPS JZ4780 CI20

Paul Boddie paul at boddie.org.uk
Sat Apr 13 21:48:05 CEST 2019


On Saturday 13. April 2019 20.02.15 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> I have spent some minutes on adapting LetuxOS to the CI20 so that we
> eventually can create bootable SD cards with "makesd".
> I have a first success:
> Net:   dm9000
> Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
> 4058380 bytes read in 673 ms (5.8 MiB/s)
> ## Booting kernel from Legacy Image at 88000000 ...
>    Image Name:   Linux-4.19.34-letux-l400+
>    Image Type:   MIPS Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed)
>    Data Size:    4058316 Bytes = 3.9 MiB
>    Load Address: 80010000
>    Entry Point:  8065f750
>    Verifying Checksum ... OK
>    Uncompressing Kernel Image ... OK
> Starting kernel ...

The details certainly look quite reasonable.

> This is a self-made cross-compiled SPL + U-Boot on SD card based on the
> description at https://elinux.org/CI20_Dev_Zone#Building_uboot_from_sources
> 	http://download.goldelico.com/letux-u-boot/CI20/2019-04-13/

I noticed that the CONFIG contains settings enabled for ARM/OMAP and wondered 
whether this was actually the configuration used.


> There are two issues so far:
> 1. the console output of the SPL (and U-Boot) seems to be mostly missing and
> starts not before the "Net:   dm9000" line or "Hit any key"

What is the SPL? I don't remember ever seeing anything before those messages. 
One thing which I did encounter was some confusion about which UART was being 
used. Ultimately, I used UART0, but I do wonder if U-Boot might use another 
UART early on.

Here is a page on the topic:


What I did need to do was to change /etc/inittab to enable ttyS0 for a login 
prompt to appear on UART0, but that is with the kernel starting...

> 2. Kernel is not starting
>    well, I have not found how this U-Boot wants to handle the device-tree so
> this is very expected. And I am not 100% sure if the installed kernel is
> the jz4730/Mipsbook or the jz4780/CI20 kernel (unfortunately, there is no
> Multiarch for Ingenic so we can't build universal kernels)

I don't know what Multiarch means in this context, but I would think that just 
bundling the right device tree binary would be enough. Otherwise, the SoCs are 
pretty similar, and I can't immediately think of anything that would require 
different kernels for the different devices, at least if device tree works as 

Still, this looks promising!


More information about the Lenny400 mailing list