[Gta04-owner] Second trial with QtMoko2
Sven Dyroff
S.Dyroff at phytec.de
Thu Apr 12 17:55:40 CEST 2018
Hello Nikolaus,
have you tried if GTA04A5 now moves the ball in QtMaze as smooth, fast and
natural and without stuttering as the GTA04A4?
Best regards
Sven
Von: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns at goldelico.com>
An: List for communicating with real GTA04 owners
<gta04-owner at goldelico.com>
Datum: 12.04.2018 14:52
Betreff: Re: [Gta04-owner] Second trial with QtMoko2
Gesendet von: "Gta04-owner" <gta04-owner-bounces at goldelico.com>
Am 12.04.2018 um 14:32 schrieb Sven Dyroff <S.Dyroff at phytec.de>:
Hello Nikolaus,
it would astonish me if you're right, but of course I'll then test it
again in order to give you a chance to astonish me... :-))
I have done this test for you:
GTA04A4 and GTA04A5 with display upside on the table with the same µSD
card (i.e. boot A5 first, then swap card and boot A4).
Run evtest /dev/input/accel | head -20 and write down highest X/Y/Z
values.
On a GTA04A5:
root at letux:~# evtest /dev/input/accel | head -20
Input driver version is 1.0.1
Input device ID: bus 0x0 vendor 0x0 product 0x0 version 0x0
Input device name: "accelerometer-iio-input-bridge"
Supported events:
Event type 0 (EV_SYN)
Event type 3 (EV_ABS)
Event code 0 (ABS_X)
Value 14
Min -511
Max 511
Event code 1 (ABS_Y)
Value -32
Min -511
Max 511
Event code 2 (ABS_Z)
Value -253
Min -511
Max 511
Properties:
Testing ... (interrupt to exit)
root at letux:~#
This means: X=14/256 = +5%, Y=--32/256 = -12%, Z=-253/256 = -99%
On a GTA04A4:
root at letux:~# evtest /dev/input/accel | head -20
Input driver version is 1.0.1
Input device ID: bus 0x0 vendor 0x0 product 0x0 version 0x0
Input device name: "accelerometer-iio-input-bridge"
Supported events:
Event type 0 (EV_SYN)
Event type 3 (EV_ABS)
Event code 0 (ABS_X)
Value -15
Min -511
Max 511
Event code 1 (ABS_Y)
Value -5
Min -511
Max 511
Event code 2 (ABS_Z)
Value 274
Min -511
Max 511
Properties:
Testing ... (interrupt to exit)
root at letux:~#
This means: X=-15/256 = +6%, Y=--5/256 = -2%, Z=274/256 = +107%
Comparing A4 and A5: they basically behave *the same* regarding the range
and report both +/-256 for 1g. They just differ in the orientation of the
sensor.
I.e. the Z axis also has a sign error. This is still missing in my
correction patch.
To make it really precise I should rotate both devices by 90° and write
down all
values...
What I don't know and can't compare is if they behave like a GTA02... And
if a total value of ~1g is what QtMaze expects. And if the QtMaze makes
use
of the Z-axis at all (doesn't look as if it does).
BR,
Nikolaus
Best regards
Sven
Von: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns at goldelico.com>
An: List for communicating with real GTA04 owners <
gta04-owner at goldelico.com>
Datum: 12.04.2018 14:25
Betreff: Re: [Gta04-owner] Second trial with QtMoko2
Gesendet von: "Gta04-owner" <gta04-owner-bounces at goldelico.com>
Hi Sven,
Am 12.04.2018 um 14:19 schrieb Sven Dyroff <S.Dyroff at phytec.de>:
Hello Nikolaus,
fine, but this will "only" correct the swapping. It will still not correct
the calibration.
Whereat the comments of the affected source give a nice hint: "On my
GTA04, sitting flat on the table, the raw Z acceleration value is about
256, so we divide by 256 here."
So I suggest to add a further printf of the value of "accel -> z", in
order that your code will provide you the needed calibration data that you
can then use for "accel -> [xyz]scale" in case of having detected a
GTA04A5.
It is easier than a printf: evtest /dev/input/accel reports the range
[0..512] and the current values.
I have checked that and the GTA04A5 also reports roughly 256.
So I think you should test (after I have uploaded it to the server) if it
is now ok for you.
BR,
Nikolaus
Best regards
Sven
Von: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns at goldelico.com>
An: Sven Dyroff <S.Dyroff at phytec.de>
Kopie: List for communicating with real GTA04 owners <
gta04-owner at goldelico.com>
Datum: 11.04.2018 19:21
Betreff: Re: [Gta04-owner] Second trial with QtMoko2
Hi Sven,
Am 05.04.2018 um 18:05 schrieb Sven Dyroff <S.Dyroff at phytec.de>:
Hello Nikolaus,
> I have now booted my GTA04A4 and the orientation is completely correct.
> Hm. Maybe a subtle difference between GTA04A4 and A5? They use different
accelerometer chips.
something like that is what I already assumed. Would have wondered me if
some scaling factors would have gone lost by just rebuilding QtMoko...
I have now added a device version detection to swap the horizontal axis if
we run on a GTA04A5:
http://git.goldelico.com/?p=gta04-qtmoko.git;a=commit;h=04c30a3b18be8b55148427d6c63423837f6a77cc
I have not yet published the new debian packages, but will do soon. So
apt-get update will not
yet find anything new.
BR,
Nikolaus
_______________________________________________
Gta04-owner mailing list
Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
_______________________________________________
Gta04-owner mailing list
Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
_______________________________________________
Gta04-owner mailing list
Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
_______________________________________________
Gta04-owner mailing list
Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/attachments/20180412/0864cc9c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gta04-owner
mailing list