[Gta04-owner] [PATCH 0/4] UART slave device support - version 4

[Pavel Machek]

> > asking "device tree maintainer opinion", and then just simply ignoring
> > it when he does not like it, and then making promises he did not keep.
> 
> Which promises did I not keep? Please be specific, instead of

You promised to shut up.

> Please have a look into our RFC implementation and study it carefully
> to learn why it is the better (IMHO more flexible, easier to maintain, more
> modular) approach. Even if you don’t like phandles.

It was also NAKed by device tree maintainers.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html