[Gta04-owner] [PATCH 1/2] video: td028ttec1: Add possibility to pass spi gpio via platform data.
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
hns at goldelico.com
Fri Jul 26 07:47:25 CEST 2013
Am 25.07.2013 um 22:47 schrieb NeilBrown:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:24:19 +0200 Marek Belisko
> <marek.belisko at open-nandra.com> wrote:
>
>> Fixing issue 186: http://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-kernel/issues/186/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko at open-nandra.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Compile tested only as my gta04 battery is gone :(.
>>
>> .../video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c | 67 +++++++++++++---------
>> include/video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h | 11 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
>> index 48cc10b..99ffac1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>
>> //#include <plat/display.h>
>> #include <video/omapdss.h>
>> +#include <video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio.h>
>>
>> static struct omap_video_timings td028ttec1_panel_timings = {
>> @@ -54,6 +55,10 @@ struct jbt_info {
>> u_int16_t tx_buf[4];
>> struct spi_device *spi_dev;
>> int state;
>> + int gpio_cs;
>> + int gpio_scl;
>> + int gpio_din;
>> + int gpio_dout;
>> };
>>
>> static struct jbt_info _jbt, *jbt = &_jbt;
>> @@ -61,16 +66,10 @@ static struct jbt_info _jbt, *jbt = &_jbt;
>> #define JBT_COMMAND 0x000
>> #define JBT_DATA 0x100
>>
>> -// FIXME: this should be passed from the board initialization structure or should be set by driver parameters
>> -#define GPIO_CS (machine_is_gta04()?19:161)
>> -#define GPIO_SCL (machine_is_gta04()?12:162)
>> -#define GPIO_DIN (machine_is_gta04()?18:159)
>> -#define GPIO_DOUT (machine_is_gta04()?20:158)
>> -
>> -#define SPI_READ() (gpio_get_value(GPIO_DIN))
>> -#define SPI_CS(bit) (gpio_set_value(GPIO_CS, bit))
>> -#define SPI_SDA(bit) (gpio_set_value(GPIO_DOUT, bit))
>> -#define SPI_SCL(bit) (gpio_set_value(GPIO_SCL, bit))
>> +#define SPI_READ() (gpio_get_value(jbt->gpio_din))
>> +#define SPI_CS(bit) (gpio_set_value(jbt->gpio_cs, bit))
>> +#define SPI_SDA(bit) (gpio_set_value(jbt->gpio_dout, bit))
>> +#define SPI_SCL(bit) (gpio_set_value(jbt->gpio_scl, bit))
>>
>> /* 150uS minimum clock cycle, we have two of this plus our other
>> * instructions */
>> @@ -152,33 +151,33 @@ int jbt_reg_write16(struct jbt_info *jbt, u_int8_t reg, u_int16_t data)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> -int jbt_reg_init(void)
>> +static int jbt_reg_init(struct jbt_info *jbt)
>> {
>> int r;
>>
>> printk("jbt_reg_init()\n");
>>
>> - SPI_CS(1); // unselect
>> - SPI_SCL(1); // inactive
>> - SPI_SDA(0); // default
>> -
>> - r = gpio_request(GPIO_CS, "TD028_CS");
>> + r = gpio_request(jbt->gpio_cs, "TD028_CS");
>> if(r < 0)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_CS GPIO %d\n", GPIO_CS);
>> - r = gpio_request(GPIO_SCL, "TD028_SCL");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_CS GPIO %d\n", jbt->gpio_cs);
>> + r = gpio_request(jbt->gpio_scl, "TD028_SCL");
>> if(r < 0)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_SCL GPIO %d\n", GPIO_SCL);
>> - r = gpio_request(GPIO_DOUT, "TD028_DOUT");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_SCL GPIO %d\n", jbt->gpio_scl);
>> + r = gpio_request(jbt->gpio_dout, "TD028_DOUT");
>> if(r < 0)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_DOUT GPIO %d\n", GPIO_DOUT);
>> - r = gpio_request(GPIO_DIN, "TD028_DIN");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_DOUT GPIO %d\n", jbt->gpio_dout);
>> + r = gpio_request(jbt->gpio_din, "TD028_DIN");
>> if(r < 0)
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_DIN GPIO %d\n", GPIO_DIN);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to get TD028_DIN GPIO %d\n", jbt->gpio_din);
>>
>> - gpio_direction_output(GPIO_CS, true);
>> - gpio_direction_output(GPIO_SCL, true);
>> - gpio_direction_output(GPIO_DOUT, true);
>> - gpio_direction_input(GPIO_DIN);
>> + gpio_direction_output(jbt->gpio_cs, true);
>> + gpio_direction_output(jbt->gpio_scl, true);
>> + gpio_direction_output(jbt->gpio_dout, true);
>> + gpio_direction_input(jbt->gpio_din);
>> +
>> + SPI_CS(1); // unselect
>> + SPI_SCL(1); // inactive
>> + SPI_SDA(0); // default
>>
>> /* according to data sheet: wait 50ms (Tpos of LCM). However, 50ms
>> * seems unreliable with later LCM batches, increasing to 90ms */
>> @@ -261,15 +260,27 @@ enum jbt_register {
>>
>> };
>>
>> +static struct panel_td028ttec1_data
>> +*get_panel_data(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>> +{
>> + return (struct panel_td028ttec1_data *) dssdev->data;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int td028ttec1_panel_probe(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>> {
>> + struct panel_td028ttec1_data *panel_data = get_panel_data(dssdev);
>> int rc;
>>
>> printk("td028ttec1_panel_probe()\n");
>> dssdev->panel.acb = 0x28;
>> dssdev->panel.timings = td028ttec1_panel_timings;
>>
>> - rc = jbt_reg_init();
>> + jbt->gpio_cs = panel_data->gpio_cs;
>> + jbt->gpio_scl = panel_data->gpio_scl;
>> + jbt->gpio_din = panel_data->gpio_din;
>> + jbt->gpio_dout = panel_data->gpio_dout;
>> +
>> + rc = jbt_reg_init(jbt);
>>
>> return 0;
>> return rc ? -ENODEV : 0;
>> diff --git a/include/video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h b/include/video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f10cc12
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/video/omap-panel-tpo-td028ttec1.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>> +#ifndef __OMAP_PANEL_TD028TTEC1_H
>> +#define __OMAP_PANEL_TD028TTEC1_H
>> +
>> +struct panel_td028ttec1_data {
>> + int gpio_cs;
>> + int gpio_scl;
>> + int gpio_din;
>> + int gpio_dout;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* __OMAP_PANEL_TD028TTEC1_H */
>
>
> Thanks. I've applied this to my 'mainline' tree.
>
> Have you looked at converting it to use the spi-gpio driver rather than doing
> the 'bitbanging' itself?
It needs some analysis if the interface is really an SPI - it just looks similar
and AFAIR it is sort of a "bidirectional" SPI with only 3 wires.
The code originates in the GTA01/GTA02 display driver.
Unfortunately we don't have much information about the JBT chip.
> I think that once that is done it will be worth trying to submit this
> upstream.
>
> If you want to try but don't know where to start, let me know and I'll
> suggest some pointers.
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
> _______________________________________________
> Gta04-owner mailing list
> Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
> http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo/gta04-owner
More information about the Gta04-owner
mailing list