[Tinkerphones] DIY "Smart"-Phone

H. Nikolaus Schaller hns at goldelico.com
Thu Jan 19 13:55:45 CET 2017


Hi Paul,

> Am 19.01.2017 um 13:38 schrieb Paul Boddie <paul at boddie.org.uk>:
> 
> On Thursday 19. January 2017 06.24.35 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Hi,
>> someone notified me about this project:
>> 
>> https://hackaday.io/project/19035-zerophone-a-raspberry-pi-smartphone/log/5
>> 1839-project-description-and-frequently-asked-questions
>> 
>> What do you think?
> 
> That people are perhaps too obsessed with Raspberry Pi devices, even though 
> claims are made about Pi Zero availability involving a site which presumably 
> pays out a jackpot if all three vendor stock indicators show "in stock". 
> Currently, only one shows "in stock".
> 
> The Pi Zero may be cheap and relatively powerful but there appears to be some 
> more work required to replace the proprietary "firmware" with Free Software, 
> with such work apparently being done by the community, not officially. It's 
> also a product that exists on a seemingly discretionary basis, but I guess 
> that finding another single-board computer and reworking everything else is 
> all part of the "fun".
> 
> (I also get infuriated when people just point others to eBay for sourcing of 
> random components from random vendors.)

Yes, that is too much tinkering. It is not reproducible for others.

> 
> As for the device itself, I think it's an interesting take on older, simpler 
> phone designs, reminding me of my Nokia 5110 which I did dismantle (and then 
> reassemble) last year in order to take some photos.

Indeed it is a simple "feature phone" from 15 years ago.

Two or three years ago I read about a chinese GSM feature phone for 12 USD incl.
battery, power supply and packaging. It did consist just of a SoC with GSM baseband
glued on the display. Like in cheap pocket calculators.

Of course such things are just cheap. And completely closed.

> The Pi Zero might not add 
> too much to the device thickness, presumably being the middle board in the 
> second device in the picture showing four different things, despite the 
> pictures showing the Pi Zero separately in a bulky enclosure for no really 
> good reason.
> 
> I don't really understand why the ATmega328P is needed when the SoC might have 
> a chance of doing the keypad scanning, but perhaps that is an easier option 
> than doing lower-level things in Raspbian.

Maybe there are not enough gpios for the keyboard matrix.

> I'd also be concerned about power 
> consumption, mostly around the SoC, and what kind of batteries one might end 
> up using.

I think they glue a power-bank on the side :) In other words: they did not (yet) care about.

> There's far too much usage of Li-Poly pouches for everything in the 
> electronics hobbyist world that is arguably storing up trouble for everybody 
> down the line.
> 
> But it's nice that the designer is trying to do everything in the open and to 
> emphasise Free Software. And I like the way that the physical aspects of the 
> device like the keypad design are freely available. Such things are often 
> overlooked in favour of the more exciting SoC-related elements of a design, 
> but here there is an opportunity for people like me to learn from these 
> things.

Yes, that is the reason why I brought it to our attention that we all can learn
from it. Innovation is sharing ideas and information and bringing together previously
unrelated topics.

> 
> Anyway, I shouldn't be one to criticise given that I'm not at this level when 
> it comes to designing hardware. But I do think that more sustainable choices 
> could be made with regard to the SoC solution. I see that the Pyra employs a 
> modular approach with its own CPU board that could be used with devices such 
> as this, and I guess that one of the EOMA family of products would be aimed at 
> something like this as well. It would be interesting to see such avenues 
> pursued.

Well, maybe someone builds a "Pyra Phone" around the Pyra CPU boards.

I personally still have to deliver the GTA4A5 which is more challenging than
the A3 an A4 (because there is much less support around and the unexpected
production issue).

BR,
Nikolaus




More information about the Community mailing list