[Community] The future of QtMoko
Gilles Filippini
gilles.filippini at free.fr
Tue Sep 23 19:47:36 CEST 2014
Hi,
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller a écrit , Le 23/09/2014 19:19:
> Hi,
> since I know that there are many QtMoko lovers out there who wait for
> new versions or new hardware that is supported, I have set up our own
> build system to compile QtMoko v58 and create GTA04-single-partition
> SD card images that might work with the newer DT based kernels we
> are working on.
>
> Here is the first result (installer for a 3.17-DT based GTA04 kernel and the
> last official rootfs):
>
> http://download.goldelico.com/gta04/qtmoko/
> makesd + unstable.tbz
>
> It boots well an the touch is working. But of course many /sys nodes
> have changed so that there is neither WLAN, Bluetooth or WWAN.
> And no battery charging, sensors etc. But GPS appears to do something.
>
> This raises some questions, especially as it appears that QtMoko isn’t
> developed any more. At least there have been no commits in the last
> 9 months.
>
> The first practical question is how to easily run the compile/test/fix cycle.
>
> It took several days on my setup (build within qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9)
> to build the qtmoko-gta04.deb, but finally it failed.
>
> The next step, building a new rootfs and install and boot is much faster but
> still slow.
>
> Q1: Is there a simple method to get the development cycle down to some minutes
> or even sub-minute?
It's been a long time since I last built QtMoko. It was cross-built on a
Debian amd64 box [1] in about 5 1/2 hours. It might be possible to go
down to a couple of hours on a decent box with parallel build enabled. See:
https://github.com/pini-gh/qtmoko/blob/master/debian/README.source
[1] AMD Athlon(tm) Neo X2 Dual Core Processor L325
Thanks,
_g.
>
> Q2: The next question is how to adapt QtMoko to newer kernels since I assume
> that there are some dependencies - at least in the /sys file names.
>
> Q3: Another question comes from the idea that QtMoko should not only run on
> the GTA02/04 devices but others as well. At least Letux 3704 and Letux7004,
> but OpenPandora, Pyra and Neo900 are also nice candidates. Interested?
>
> Q4: This raises a follow-up question: does QtMoko (and the apps) adapt automatically
> to different screen sizes (or orientations like Neo900)?
>
> Q5: Apropos GTA04: we could make QtMoko the standard install of the GTA04A5
> production image - retiring the primitive LXDE… Interested?
>
> Q6: The next question goes @Radek (I hope he still reads here): do you plan to
> continue this work, i.e. accept patches? Or should we start and maintain a fork?
>
> Q7: Finally, who is interested in developing and contributing towards making QtMoko
> the most simple but greatest Telephony-GUI and helps to push the packages to
> the mainline Debian?
>
> Q8: should we base future development on donations like the kernel and Replicant?
> If we find enough donations we could even pay someone for working continuously
> on it.
>
> A9: Other thoughs?
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at openphoenux.org
> http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/community
> http://www.openphoenux.org
>
More information about the Community
mailing list