[Openpvrsgx-devgroup] New version letux-pvrsrvkm-v5.6.0-rc1 available
tony at atomide.com
Sun Feb 16 20:37:42 CET 2020
* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com> [200216 18:47]:
> Hi Tony,
> > Am 16.02.2020 um 19:29 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>:
> > Hi,
> > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns at goldelico.com> [200211 13:28]:
> >> A new version of our holistic PVR/SGX driver is available
> >> Kernel: v5.6.0-rc1
> >> Result: letux-pvrsrvkm-v5.6.0-rc1 (rebased on v5.6.0-rc1)
> >> Result: letux-pvrsrvkm (linear history)
> >> Github: https://github.com/openpvrsgx-devgroup/linux_openpvrsgx/branches
> >> Components:
> > ...
> >> letux/pvrsrvkm-1.17.4948957
> > FYI, I heard from ruleh on #maemo-leste today that this branch has been
> > updated for kernel modules and the omap5-sgx-ddk-um-linux branch for
> > related blobs. And the blobs now at least init with pvrsrvinit also on
> > omap4 and presumably also on omap34xx.
> > So presumably now oma34xx (n900) and am3517 should work the same as
> > in the beaglebone example but with 1.17:
> > http://blog.0xpebbles.org/PowerVR-SGX-on-the-beaglebone-black-in-2019
> > Nikolaus, care to check that letux/pvrsrvkm-1.17.4948957 is
> > in sync? Stuff has just recently gotten updated it seems.
> Wow, cool!
> shows e.g.:
> km: Migrate to kernel version 5.4
> km: Add build targets for sgx530-121 and sgx540-120 devices
Yeah. The target for omap4430 and 4460 seems to be named "ti443x"
and for omap34xx "ti343x".
> > So I guess I should patch the pvr-drv to work with that branch
> > now unless already done?
> Yes. I think we should update our 1.17 branch first to match latest TI work
> and then add pvr-drv for it.
OK sounds good to me.
More information about the openpvrsgx-devgroup