[Letux-kernel] ti,non-removable vs. non-removable
H. Nikolaus Schaller
hns at goldelico.com
Sun Jun 17 18:02:35 CEST 2018
we still use ti,non-removable; for mmc ports but I wonder if is it safe
to replace it with non-removable; ?
The bindings docs tell not much:
Only one of the properties in this section should be supplied:
- broken-cd: There is no card detection available; polling must be used.
- cd-gpios: Specify GPIOs for card detection, see gpio binding
- non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC); assume always present.
- ti,non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC)
So are they interchangeable or do they have subtle difference?
BR and thanks,
More information about the Letux-kernel