[Gta04-owner] Linux 3.5 on GTA04
khremeviuc at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 24 11:28:10 CEST 2012
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 17:27 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:31:26 +0200 Radek Polak <psonek2 at seznam.cz> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 08:13:07 AM NeilBrown wrote:
> > > I think that is all. Power management seems to be largely unchanged - 25mA
> > > when in suspend, about 70mA when idle, awake, screen off, and about 200mA
> > > when idle and awake with screen on. I'll be using this on my phone on a
> > > regular basis and see how it goes.
> > Hi Neil,
> > i am now using 3.5 kernel with QtMoko. It looks good. I have implemented the
> > jack detection and it works great. I have also adapted the GPS code - it now
> > just rfkill blocks/unblock gps.
> > While i was working on these new features I have noticed one strange thing.
> > The device took in suspend 21..25mA. After reboot it is back at ~35 mA. So i
> > wonder what could have triggered the low power in suspend. I cant reproduce it
> > anymore ;-(
> I wish I knew. I've seen similar things but haven't had a chance to look
> into it yet. I'll try to pay a bit more attention and see if I can see a
> > One more thing - i was trying to find out how much current is the modem
> > drawing. I have A4 version so i powered the modem off with this  script. I
> > was expecting that the current will go down, but it's even higher - around
> > 45mA in suspend. I wonder what is wrong...
> Maybe it is something else altogether. Maybe something turned on at the same
> time you turned the modem off, or shortly before/after, so it looked like the
> current is due to the modem, but actually it is something else.
> > Btw have you noticed that in 3.4 or 3.5 kernel you can wake the device from
> > suspend with touchscreen?
I mentioned this ages ago when I tried the 3.4 kernel but no-one
believed me. 3.5 is exactly the same. I have been using it for a bit
because I ended up believing that tapping the touch screen to wake the
device up is what you guys wanted.
> No I hadn't. My phone is configured to enter suspend immediately whenever
> there is not a good reason to be awake (and e.g. power button press means
> there is good reason to be awake for 15 seconds - screen taps extend that
> So I would only notice by increased power consumption - which I have noticed
> occasionally - or close inspection of the logs - which I haven't.
> Having examined the code it doesn't look like it is trivial to fix.
> The wakeup-enable is deliberately turned on so that the CPU can go into deep
> sleep when idle (if off_mode is enabled) and still be woken up by interrupts.
> We do want this.
> But that 'wakeup-enable-for-deep-sleep' flag has been confused with the
> 'wakeup-enable-for-suspend' flag. I'll need to separate them so a screen tap
> will wake the CPU if it is sleeping for a few milliseconds between taps, but
> not if it is suspended and in my pocket.
> This recent patch:
> commit 0aa2727399c0b78225021413022c164cb99fbc5e
> Author: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti at ti.com>
> Date: Fri Apr 27 19:43:33 2012 +0530
> gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
> looks interesting. It appears to be removing the functionality that I think
> I want to add!! It is a little different though so I isn't simply a case
> that someone broke something. I'm not sure when I get to drill into this as
> I'll be at conferences in San Diego all next week :-)
> > Regards
> > Radek
> > 
> > https://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/blob/master/devices/gta04/src/devtools/scripts/modem-
> > poweroff.sh
> Script doesn't seem to match the doco...
> Doco (GTA04A4-3_System_Manual_Complete.pdf) says:
> 0 -> 1 turns it on
> 1 -> 0 -> 1 -> 0 turns it off:
> Power is controlled through GPIO186. Setting the GPIO to “1“ (for at least 200 ms) turns
> the module on and it will register itself on the internal USB port. Setting the GPIO to 0 and
> 1 again prepares for power-down5 and the final edge going to 0 turns the module off. In
> that state it draws <100 uA and can be waked up by another switch to 1.
> Therefore these pulses should be 0-1-0 for approx. 300 ms.
> Don't know how relevant the difference is.
> Gta04-owner mailing list
> Gta04-owner at goldelico.com
More information about the Gta04-owner